Create a consistent signal across diverse courses.
Support varied school and faculty approaches with a shared way to make individual understanding visible after an assessment.
Integrevise for the University of Pennsylvania
Integrevise turns an existing Penn submission into a short adaptive viva, giving faculty direct evidence of what each student understands and every student personalized feedback—without scheduling every conversation manually.
Value at every level
Integrevise adds a practical evidence layer while Penn schools retain their own AI policies, assessments and academic judgment.
Support varied school and faculty approaches with a shared way to make individual understanding visible after an assessment.
Probe what each student can explain, justify and defend without conducting every oral check-in manually.
Offer a transparent, developmental opportunity to demonstrate mastery and receive personalized feedback.
Evidence before adoption
Integrevise’s adaptive oral approach has been evaluated in a university setting and published in the peer-reviewed journal Trends in Higher Education.
Read the peer-reviewed studyDirectly aligned with Penn
CETLI’s April 2026 faculty discussion framed oral components as a measure of authentic student learning in response to generative AI. Its assignment-design guidance also recommends live questions and individual discussion when students need to demonstrate mastery beyond AI. Integrevise preserves that dialogic evidence while making it practical to apply after more submissions.
A simple next step
A 20-minute conversation is enough to map one current assignment, explore where oral evidence would help and decide whether the approach merits a closer look.
Book a 20-minute conversation No module selection, procurement process or assessment redesign needed.